tommyl’s posterous

 

Wondering how 3D movie tech and stories will evolve after Avatar

We finally saw Avatar earlier today, and it was worth it in 3D at an iMax theater. The movie was certainly ambitious and ground breaking from an infotech view. But like The Great Train Robbery and The Jazz Singer, I think it will seem pretty primitive in contrast to stuff that comes afterward.  And afterward is coming pretty quickly.  The showing today included previews for a Shrek and Alice in Wonderland movies in 3D and iMax. 

Wonder how all this stuff will evolve 5 years or so down the road?

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Start of a big snow storm

(download)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Keep the explanations coming from science journalists.

Say you're browsing the web and you uncover a scientific or technical topic you want to know more about. Not just something like the iPad, but something really technical like the impact of genetically modified Eucalyptus trees. Well, you could delve into the academic research on the topic, if that's available. But even if you find it, it may be densely written prose with unfamiliar terms and hard to grasp concepts. I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound like much fun.

Enter science journalism. Chances are someone's digested the dense scientific material and written up in the kind of language that doesn't take a phD to understand. Like this article on genetically modified Eucalyptus trees in Discover. 

I was surprised when I discovered another article on science journalism itself, and the trouble it's having. Science journalism fits in with what Alex Jones calls the "iron core" of news. That is, it's the hard core news that can only come from expert journalists, whatever that means. It may not be the most popular news, but it's the toughest to report on, write and edit. It takes long training and expensive support to hold it up. Used to be, the softer features and the like helped sell enough newspapers and advertising to subsidize the iron core. 

That subsidy is going the way of the dodo bird and the Rocky Mountain Post. And science journalism is probably in as much or more danger than other types of news. And the idea that news is migrating to the web has a few holes in it. There's lots of news content out there, to be sure. But a lot of it is commentary and opinion based on the kind of iron core journalism we're talking about here. There's much debate about the future of news and journalism, but I find this one troubling. 

I can probably do without the tenth story on a political topic, but I still want to have genetically modified Eucalyptus trees explained to me in language I can grasp.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Cinch on the Mac lets me tip my hat to the Redmond Borg

A few years ago Windows XP crashed on me one too many times, taking some valuable content with it, as I remember. Well, I switched to the Mac and haven't really looked back since. But when the Redmond Borg started showing commercials for Windows 7, I did see one thing that intrigued me. I don't remember exactly what they call it, but it's the feature that lets you put two windows side by side just by dragging them to the edge of the screen.

"Hm, that might be useful," I remember saying, then forgetting about the whole thing. Today I'm experimenting around with my workflow and thought the feature might just be useful. Of course, I'm not gonna revert to Windoze. But I did remember seeing a reference to a Mac version of the feature, so I looked it up and downloaded a copy. I'm using it right now.

The software's called Cinch and it's put out by Irradiated Software.

What's cool about Cinch is how it lets me easily get two windows side by side just by dragging them. I'm a big drag and dropper, so you can see the advantage this arrangement provides. It's especially helpful for moving or copying stuff between two folders.
But beyond housekeeping functions, Cinch is useful for writing blog posts like this one, or composing comments, tweets, whatever. I usually think of post ideas when reading stuff in Safari: RSS feeds, tweet, Facebook updates, and the like. What Cinch lets me do is continue looking at or reading the content in the browser while I compose something in the other window. And it's easy to drag in content if I want to include it as a quote in the post I'm composing.

I haven't tried it yet with images, but I'd bet that's easy, too.

So it's with some reluctance that I endorse an idea from the Windows world. But thank goodness someone translated it something useful on the Mac.
A belated and slight hat tip to Borg HQ in Redmond.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Will the iPhone and Kindle please get married already?

The move may also represent a shift in Amazon’s relationship with newspapers and magazines that make digital editions for the Kindle. Many executives at those organizations have expressed dissatisfaction with their 30 percent cut of subscription fees on the Kindle and lack of a direct relationship with those subscribers.

With a Kindle app store, those media companies will be able to sell more profitable Kindle applications, and present news that is updated throughout the day.

Yes! That's the one big knock I have with the Kindle now. I love reading The Times, but it only gets delivered once a day. On the other hand, I also use an iPhone for news updates, and that gets news and information as it's released. Trouble is the iPhone's tiny and not eye-friendly like the Kindle. On the other hand, I'm not paying exorbitant amounds to the Borg networks for delivering content to the Kindle.

I still want to see what Apple offers up with this tablet thing. After all, they have the iphone and app store already so they don't have to develop these same things as Amazon does. But what they don't have is something that's easy enough and adaptable enough to make my eyes happy. So I guess that's really what I'm looking for: something that marries the functionality of the iPhone with the ease and convenience of reading on the Kindle.

All for $50, of course, with no contracts. Hey, I can dream, can't I?

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Caught my eye at the eye doctor.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Miserable day for exercising outside, but got it in anyway.

(download)

(download)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

The Age of External Knowledge - Idea of the Day Blog - NYTimes.com

David Dalrymple, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, thinks human memory will no longer be the key repository of knowledge, and focus will supersede erudition. Quote:

Hm, interesting but I'm not sure Dalrymple's ideas hold water across the board. I'm OK looking up information that might help me reboot a hung computer or fix a malfunctioning toaster oven or whatever. But I sure wouldn't want to rely on looking stuff up to treat serious medical symptoms.

Information needs context to become knowledge. Can software and storage algorithms connect the dots for us? Not in every case, and probably not in the most important ones. That still takes a human brain.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

There's an app for that, but why not just open your eyes and look?

Distracted driving has gained much attention lately because of the inflated crash risk posed by drivers using cellphones to talk and text.

But there is another growing problem caused by lower-stakes multitasking — distracted walking — which combines a pedestrian, an electronic device and an unseen crack in the sidewalk, the pole of a stop sign, a toy left on the living room floor or a parked (or sometimes moving) car.

The era of the mobile gadget is making mobility that much more perilous, particularly on crowded streets and in downtown areas where multiple multitaskers veer and swerve and walk to the beat of their own devices.

Yep, there's an app for that. I know of at least one iPhone app that superimposes whatever you're typing over a camera image of what's in front of you. You can just imagine a world where people come to depend on these sorts of devices to avoid running into things. And folks will show their age by talking fondly of the days when sighted people actually used their eyes.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

What's happened to fact checking?

Yesterday former baseball player Mark McQuire came clean about using steroids. No surprise, but it brought forth links to stories about steroid use, including this one Esquire first published in April 2008. I read it and put a link to it on Twitter.

So this morning I'm at the gym struggling through leg day when I mentioned it to a trainer. Only thing is, I'd misquoted the author as having improved his dumb bell bench press 30 pounds in one day while taking the drugs. I thought he'd said he pressed 190 pounds dumb bells, and I took that to mean in each hand. Well, that turned out to be my mistake: that was really the total for both dumbells. Turns out you'd have to be world class strong to do that.

Anyhow, that got me thinking about how the Esquire editors had fact checked the article. I sent the trainer a link to the article in hopes of more review.

What I got back from that review made me take notice and got me riled up about the state of fact checking in the stories we read.

Okay so his dumb bell presses went up by 15 lbs each. To be honest that’s not that spectacular, considering the amount of protein he’s consuming. We’ve worked with many people who have made those types of gains with a really controlled diet. As for the amount of weight, I train several guys who do more weight and are drug free. His ‘before’ bench press is 15 lbs more than mine. And for the protein - he said there is 13 grams of protein in a can of tuna? No, it’s 32.5 g in a can of tuna. He said he consumed 337 g protein a day (that’s 2,359g per week). He said he went through 4 tubs of muscle milk a week which is 1920 g – sooo, that means he’s practically met his protein intake with just powder. That doesn’t even begin to touch the 20 cans of tuna a day and egg whites, etc… . My guess is it’s another attempt at scaring people and like I said before, people blow holes in it and then think it’s all a lie.

My reaction now is Esquire should be ashamed of itself for not fact checking the story before printing it. WTF's happened to the idea of editing before you publish? Even the NY Times has laid off many of its copy editors and you can spot typos now. Seems to me magazines like Esquire have traded accuracy for literary gems like: "The first week of the cycle, my nipples start to itch."

Oh, the humanity

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]